“SER OU NÃO SER?” ESTUDO TEÓRICO SOBRE TRADE-OFFS EM SUSTENTABILIDADE ORGANIZACIONAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
It has increasingly figured in the agenda of studies and research, which seek not only to understand the concept of so-called sustainable development, but also to understand how it is integrated into the organizational environment. Angus-Leppan, Benn, Young, (2010) explain that Organizational Sustainability (OS) is an ambiguous term, since there is considerable debate regarding the range of characteristics of organizations. Thus, the need to explore the theme is evident. Utne (2008, p. 2) in his own way defines that “organizational sustainability can be characterized by three pillars: ecological, social and economic”. Hahn et al. (2010) cites Bansal (2005) to highlight that according to the win-win paradigm, corporate contributions to sustainable development are achieved only at the intersection of the three principles of environmental integrity, social equity and economic prosperity. However, this work encompasses the idea, made explicit by Hahn et al. (2010) that although there is growing evidence that advantageous situations can exist under certain conditions, the authors warn that the assumption that these three principles correlate in harmony is quite simplistic, given the complex and multifaceted nature of sustainable development. In this conceptual space, the disharmony that may happen between the pillars of the SO, as well as this dynamic of organizational sustainability, the concept of trade-offs in Organizational Sustainability is inserted. The concept of trade-offs arising from the economy has figured in organizational studies for some time, however, it is still a topic little discussed in studies focused on sustainability. This work seeks to present, based on theorists, that the trade-off theme is closely related to the study of Organizational Sustainability. It can be concluded that the concept of trade-offs is present in the literature on Organizational Sustainability, as the conceptual relations studied show that trade-offs can be observed in the decision-making processes on sustainability (economic, social and environmental pillar), in investor options, as well as different organizational levels and dimensions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
ACOSTA-MICHLIK, L. et al. Integrated assessment of sustainability trade-offs and pathways for global bioenergy production: Framing a novel hybrid approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 15, n. 6, p. 2791-2809, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032111000530. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
ANDRADE, D. C.; ROMEIRO, A. R. Degradação ambiental e teoria econômica: algumas reflexões sobre uma “economia dos ecossistemas”. Economia, v. 12, n. 1, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.anpec.org.br/revista/vol12/vol12n1p3_26.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
ANGUS‐LEPPAN, T.; BENN, S.; YOUNG, L. A sensemaking approach to trade‐offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 19, n. 4, p. 230-244, 2010. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.674/pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
BERNUÉS, A. et al. Sustainability of pasture-based livestock farming systems in the European Mediterranean context: Synergies and trade-offs. Livestock Science, v. 139, n. 1-2, p. 44-57, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141311001016. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
BORGES, F. H.; TACHIBANA, W. K. A Variável Ambiental e as Organizações: Um estudo de caso. SEGeT–Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia, p. 1-16, 2007. Disponível em https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos07/1331_A%20VARIAVEL%20AMBIENTAL%20E%20AS%20ORGANIZACOES.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
BOUMAN, B. A. M. et al. Quantifying economic and biophysical sustainability trade-offs in land use exploration at the regional level: a case study for the Northern Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica. Ecological Modelling, v. 114, n. 1, p. 95-109, 1998. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380098001215. Acesso em: Jan. 2013.
BOUMAN, B. A. M.; PLANT, R. A. J.; NIEUWENHUYSE, A. Quantifying economic and biophysical sustainability trade-offs in tropical pastures. Ecological modelling, v. 120, n. 1, p. 31-46, 1999. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380099000666. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
BRUNDTLAND, G. H. Our common future—Call for action. Environmental conservation, v. 14, n. 4, p. 291-294, 1987.
CARVALHO, T. S.; ALMEIDA, E. A hipótese da curva de Kuznets ambiental global: uma perspectiva econométrico-espacial. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), v. 40, p. 587-615, 2010. Disponível em : http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612010000300004 . Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
CORBETT, C.; VAN WASSENHOVE, L. Trade-offs? What trade-offs? Competence and competitiveness in manufacturing strategy. California management review, v. 35, n. 4, p. 107-122, 1993. Disponível em: http://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/Inseadwp1991/91-25.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
DELMAS, M.; BLASS, V. D. Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade‐offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 19, n. 4, p. 245-260, 2010. Disponível em http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.674/pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
DEVOIL, P.; ROSSING, W. A. H; HAMMER, G. L. Exploring profit–sustainability trade-offs in cropping systems using evolutionary algorithms. Environmental modelling & software, v. 21, n. 9, p. 1368-1374, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815205001453. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
ELKINGTON, J. Canibais com garfo e faca. São Paulo: Makron Books, 2001.
FARIA, A. C.; COSTA, M. F. G. Gestão de Custos Logísticos. São Paulo: Editora Atlas, 2005.
FRANCHINI, A. A. et al. Uma revisão teórica acerca do desenvolvimento sustentável e o meio ambiente: o caso brasileiro. In: XLII Congresso da SOBER, 2004, Brasília. Anais XLII Congresso da SOBER, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.sober.org.br/palestra/12/05P310.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
GIBSON, R. B. Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, v. 8, n. 03, p. 259-280, 2006. Disponível em: http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=196458406&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
HAHN, T. et al. Trade‐offs in corporate sustainability: You can't have your cake and eat it. Business strategy and the environment, v. 19, n. 4, p. 217-229, 201. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.674/pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
HAYES, R. H.; PISANO, G. P. Manufacturing strategy: at the intersection of two paradigm shifts. Production and operations management, v. 5, n. 1, p. 25-41, 1996. Disponível em: http://iic.wiki.fgv.br/file/view/Hayes,+RH,+Pisano,+GP+-+Manufacturing+Strategy+-+At+theIntersection+of+Two+Paradigms+Shifts.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
MARGOLIS, J. D.; WALSH, J. P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative science quarterly, v. 48, n. 2, p. 268-305, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.sustainabilitymanagement.net/public/Misery%20Loves%20Companies.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
MEIRELES, M. et al. Identificação de Preferências dos Clientes de um Supermercado de Pequeno Porte a partir da Matriz Tradeoff. Anais do III EMA (Encontro de Marketing da ANPAD). Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.anpad.org.br/evento.php?acao=trabalho&cod_edicao_subsecao=357&cod_evento_edicao=37&cod_edicao_trabalho=8308 Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
PAIVA, E. L.; CARVALHO, J. M.; FENSTERSEIFER, J. A. Estratégia de produção e de operações. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2004. 192 p.
PINKSE, J.; KOLK, A. Challenges and trade‐offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 19, n. 4, p. 261-272, 2010. Disponível em http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.674/pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
ROESCH, S. M. A. Projetos de estágio e de pesquisa em administração: guia para estágios, trabalhos de conclusão, dissertações e estudos de caso. 3º. Ed. – 5º. Reimpr. – São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
SHAHBAZPOUR, M.; SEIDEL, R. H. A. Using sustainability for competitive advantage. In: 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering. 2006. Disponível em: http://www.mech.kuleuven.be/lce2006/166.pdf. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
SKINNER, W. Manufacturing – The missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, v.47, p.5-14, May/Jun, 1969. Disponível em: http://hbr.org/1969/05/manufacturing-missing-link-in-corporate-strategy/ar/1 Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
TEIXEIRA, R.; PAIVA, E. L. Trade-offs em serviços customizados e o ponto de vista do cliente. Revista de administração contemporânea, v. 12, p. 457-480, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rac/a/rKW9mQpXN5v6p9wPXxPPCHx/. Acesso em: Ago, 2023.
UTNE, I. B. Are the smallest fishing vessels the most sustainable? — Trade-off analysis of sustainability attributes. Marine Policy, v. 32, n. 3, p. 465-474, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X07001042. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
VAN MARREWIJK, M. Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics, v. 44, p. 95-105, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.mendeley.com/research/concepts-and-definitions-of-csr-and-corporate-sustainability-between-agency-and-communion/. Acesso em: Jan, 2013.
VAN MARREWIJK, M.; WERRE, M. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business ethics, v. 44, p. 107-119, 2003. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1023383229086. Acesso em: Ago, 2023.